![]() ![]() If a majority of us Sovereign Scots don’t want Indy, then I am certain the minority won’t be forcing Indy on the majority.īut don’t despair. It has to be pointed out that this Sovereign Scots “weapon” cuts both ways. I don’t know if we will – nobody does – cos we don’t know what Scottish membership of the EU will cost us Scots in terms of hard cash and in terms of lost sovereignty.Īs for your delusion that Scotland should have been independent in 2016, what was Indy support flatlined at then? 45%? Get a grip. Once these had been (or have been, if this happens in the future, post Indy) negotiated, we sovereign Scots may or may not choose to vote to dissolve Scotland in the EU. There never was a route that would have allowed Scotland to stay in the EU while England departed, not unless the entire Scottish EU membership T’s and C’s were negotiated from scratch. Maybes there is a convention on here to be kind to the deluded? I don’t know why it falls to me to tell you you are writing mince. ![]() The fight for Independence is as strong as it ever was, it just isn’t the fight Westminster has conditioned us to expect.Īpprise yourselves of what SALVO is planning. Ultimately the people, the Community of the Realm, are sovereign. SALVO is uncovering how the Claim of Right actually worked, how it kept absolute power from some, and held power in check for the Common Good of the people. The Claim of Right is that wee tip of an artefact which gives the archaeologist the inspiration to dig a wee bit deeper and find more. It isn’t a thing Westminster “concedes” to keep us “Jocks” quiet. The Claim of Right isn’t a vestigial token of what once was. It wasn’t started by politicians, but SALVO, and a long misunderstood Claim of Right which can now be reinterpreted after new and forgotten information has been rediscovered. The real deal for Independence is the battle for Constitutional Sovereignty, and that battle has only recently begun. The SNP has only crashed the stalking horse for Independence. While helpful to have one certainly, we don’t necessarily need a democratic mandate to end the Union because there is a parallel path to discredit the Union if the contract, the Treaty of Union, has been breached, and YES, it very much has!ĭemocracy is not a prerequisite of Constitutional Sovereignty, but we’re not abandoning democracy if the Constitutional “Claim of Right” route to Independence is subjected to a ratification Plebiscite. The power is here, in Scotland, in our own heads. The power to remove Scotland from the Union does not reside in Holyrood, nor does it reside in London. People STILL aren’t seeing the rabbit here. If Sturgeons stupidity truncated the powers of Holyrood, what use is Holyrood to us if it merely the dutiful servant of the 1998 Scotland Act? The difference between Holyrood’s route to Independence and the Constitutional “Claim of Right” route to Independence is the same difference between a BBC soap opera, and real life. We shouldn’t be wasting time choosing which one of these jokers should lead us, we should really be choosing which ones to put in jail, … and whether it’s the guillotine or the oubliette for the SNP… because they’ve learned NOTHING, and the same infuriating hubris still blinds their path to redemption and reconciliation. Scotland could have been, should have been, Independent in 2016, but the SNP were utterly feckless and / or corrupt, and threw away a victory which most of them didn’t even know they had won. She held every Ace in the deck… and folded. But as we know, all Sturgeon did was capitulate. Scotland was free! With a Scottish Backstop underpinned by the Claim of Right, ALL Sturgeon had to do was NOT capitulate. That alone should have halted Brexit.Ī Brexit halted meant Scotland having a sovereign veto over the UK and Scotland could effectively subjugate England.Ī split Brexit going ahead for England but not for Scotland, (like NI) violates the Articles of Union. ![]() Had Sturgeon simply underpinned Scotland’s emphatic rejection of Brexit with the constitutional sovereignty of the Claim of Right, she could then have stood back to watch the Treaty of Union implode upon itself.Ī Brexit going ahead meant Scotland’s unconstitutional subjugation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |